Rugby Coaching Blog | Professional Rugby Advice & Coaching


2009 will define the 2011 Rugby World Cup winning coach by David Clarke

The next couple of months will shape the coaching staffs for the major World Cup teams. The governing bodies know that two years about the minimum time a coach can make a real impact. Of course some have had immediate success: Warren Gatland for Wales and perhaps Robbie Deans for Australia. The jury is still out on Pieter De Villiers of South Africa, and Martin Johnson not really the coach for England.

The Six Nations will tell us something about the ambitions of the teams. The Lions tour will define some of the possible stars of the World Cup.

But for me, 2009 will show us how the shape of the game has changed at the top table. The ELVs and breakdown protocols have now filtered through. Referees are becoming more consistent in their interpretation. Players have adpated on field and coaches off field. I don’t see much new after the middle of 2009 and into the Tri Nations.

The competition will revert to the most skilful, best prepared side winning; a mix of the talent available and the coaching expertise to manage those resources. I cannot see the World Cup winning coach not in place at the end of this year. The big four, that is the only four winners of the World Cup, are still in the box seats today, but the hopefuls, that is Argentina, France and even perhaps Wales and Ireland, need to get 2009 right if they want to be in the final mix.

The coaching challenges remain the same, at all levels. This year will define the personnel.

Advertisements

2 Comments so far
Leave a comment

I would definitely be pleased if sometimes you could say just a word or two about french rugby.

You all english-speaking always ignore France, Italy or Argentina as if they never existed on the rugby scene.

Now I read “France” in the “hopefuls”… but to me it seems France is far more successful, even in this transition period, than England, for example.

Comment by Jacques Foury

Jacques, I am on record as a great supporter of the Lievremont methods of coaching. I put England above France just because they have converted key games in World Cups. Were they the 2nd best side in the RWC2009? Probably not, but they still beat Australia and France. And the same in 2003, when France might well have beaten them again. France are top of the hopefuls. Will Argentina sustain their progress? Their infrastructure is weak, though never their passion.

Dan

Comment by Dan




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



%d bloggers like this: